Author: Mark Whitfield

Welcome to my site! After graduating in Computing in 1990, I accepted a position as a programmer at a Runcorn based software house specialising in electronic banking software, namely sp/ARCHITECT-BANK on Tandem Computers (now HPE NonStop). This was before the internet became more prevalent and so the notion of enabling desktop access to company accounts for inter-account transfers and book keeping was still quite a cutting edge idea (and smartphones only ever hinted at in Space 1999). The company was called The Software Partnership (which was taken over by Deluxe Data in 1994). I spent 5 years in Runcorn developing code for SP/ARCHITECT for various banks like TSB, Bank of Scotland, Rabobank and Girofon (Denmark) to name but a few. I then moved onto a software house in Salford Quays for further bank facing projects. After a further 23 years in the IT industry and now a Senior IT Project Manager (both Agile and Waterfall delivery), I thought I would echo out my Career Profile in this corner of the internet for quick and easy access.

Agile Scrum Backlog Grooming & Sprint Planning

Agile Scrum Backlog Grooming & Sprint Planning

Scrumban project management summary and detailed historical timeline by era and year

Scrumban is a hybrid Agile project management framework that blends the structured planning and roles of Scrum with the continuous flow and visualization of Kanban. Originally designed as a transition method for teams moving from Scrum to Kanban, it has evolved into a popular, distinct approach for teams needing to manage unpredictable work (e.g., support, maintenance) while maintaining prioritized planning. It focuses on pull-based workflows, limiting Work-in-Progress (WIP), and continuous improvement. 

Scrumban Summary

  • Best Used For: Teams needing more flexibility than Scrum (no rigid sprints) but more structure than Kanban (needs planning cycles).
  • Key Features: Visual board (Kanban), Work-in-Progress (WIP) limits, on-demand or iterative planning, and a pull-based workflow.
  • Differences from Parent Frameworks:
    • vs. Scrum: No set sprint length or rigid roles; work is pulled continuously rather than planned in batches.
    • vs. Kanban: Uses planning meetings and team retrospectives, whereas classic Kanban is purely continuous. 

Detailed Historical Timeline of Scrumban

1. The Pre-Scrumban Era (Pre-2008)

  • 1950s (Kanban Origin): Toyota develops Kanban to optimize manufacturing production processes, focusing on Just-in-Time (JIT) production.
  • 1986 (Scrum Concept): Takeuchi and Nonaka introduce the “rugby” approach to product development in the Harvard Business Review, fostering flexible, team-based development.
  • 1995 (Scrum Introduced): Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland formalize the Scrum framework for software development.
  • 2001 (Agile Manifesto): Release of the Agile Manifesto, establishing core agile principles.
  • 2004 (Kanban in Software): David J. Anderson suggests applying Kanban practices to software development to improve workflow.
  • 2000-2007 (Evolution): Microsoft teams begin experimenting with “feature crews” that mix structured planning with continuous delivery, planting the seeds for hybrid approaches. 

2. Conception and Definition (2008–2010)

  • 2008: Corey Ladas coins the term “Scrumban” and introduces the concept in his work, proposing it as a mechanism for teams to transition from Scrum to Kanban, or as a sustainable hybrid for maintaining focus while reducing iteration overhead.
  • 2008: Ajay Reddy discusses the “Scrumban (R)evolution,” emphasizing that Scrumban is a distinct, powerful approach, not merely a blend.
  • 2009: Ladas publishes “Scrumban: Essays on Kanban Systems for Lean Software Development,” providing the definitive framework for the approach. 

3. Formalization and Adoption (2011–2019)

  • Early 2010s: The methodology gains popularity in specialized software areas, such as maintenance and support teams, where unpredictable bugs demand faster flexibility than two-week sprints.
  • 2016: Ajay Reddy releases “The Scrumban [R]Evolution: Getting the Most Out of Agile, Scrum, and Lean Kanban,” providing practical guidelines for applying the methodology.
  • 2018-2019: Adoption expands beyond software development into agile marketing and HR, looking for reduced bureaucracy. 

4. Mature Hybrid & Continued Growth (2020s–Present)

  • 2020s: Scrumban is recognized as a standard agile framework within major project management tools (e.g., Jira, Miro, Monday).
  • 2025-2026: Further refinement as teams integrate AI-driven task management with visual Kanban workflows to increase throughput and automate WIP tracking. 

Core Principles of Modern Scrumban (2026 Perspective)

  1. Pull System: Work is pulled by team members when capacity allows, rather than pushed into the team.
  2. Visual Board: All tasks are visualized to show bottlenecks.
  3. WIP Limits: Restricting the number of active tasks at any stage to improve efficiency.
  4. No Required Roles: Teams can keep Scrum roles (Product Owner, Scrum Master) or remove them, depending on their needs.
  5. Adaptive Planning: Planning occurs on-demand or at short intervals, not just in strict timeboxed sprints.

Scrumban project management summary and detailed historical timeline by era and year

CPM Critical Path Method project management and detailed historical timeline by era and year

The Critical Path Method (CPM) is a foundational project management technique developed in the late 1950s to identify the longest sequence of dependent tasks (the “critical path”) that determines the minimum time needed to complete a project. By focusing on these critical tasks, managers can identify which activities have flexibility (float) and which will delay the entire project if they slip. 

Detailed Historical Timeline of CPM

Pre-Development Era (1940-1955): The Need for Speed 

  • 1940–1943: DuPont develops precursor techniques to manage scheduling challenges during the Manhattan Project.
  • Early 1950s: The U.S. Navy recognizes the need for better planning systems for complex, high-stakes defense projects. 

Development Era (1956-1959): The Birth of CPM 

  • 1956: Morgan R. Walker (DuPont) and James E. Kelley Jr. (Remington Rand) begin collaborating to create a new method for managing industrial plant maintenance shutdowns.
  • 1957: Walker and Kelley formalize the Critical Path Method (CPM). The technique is first applied to DuPont’s chemical plant projects, saving $1 million in its first year.
  • 1958: Simultaneously, the U.S. Navy and Booz Allen Hamilton develop the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) for the Polaris missile program. The term “critical path” is coined by the PERT team.
  • 1959: First paper on the critical path, “Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling,” is published by Kelley and Walker. First computer-based CPM is implemented on UNIVAC computers. 

Expansion Era (1960-1979): Industrial Adoption

  • 1961: Dr. John Fondahl develops the Precedence Diagramming Method (PDM), a manual “non-computer” alternative to early computer-heavy CPM.
  • 1962: The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) mandates the use of Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) along with network scheduling (PERT/CPM) for projects.
  • 1966: CPM is used for the first time in the construction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York City.
  • 1970s: CPM moves from chemical and defense sectors to widespread use in construction, engineering, and infrastructure projects. 

Computerization Era (1980-1999): The PC Revolution

  • 1980s: Advent of personal computers (PCs) allows project management software (like Primavera) to make CPM accessible, removing the need for expensive mainframes.
  • 1987: The Project Management Institute (PMI) publishes the first Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), standardizing CPM as a best practice.
  • 1997: Eliyahu M. Goldratt introduces Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM), a new method that builds on CPM by focusing on resource limitations rather than just activity sequence. 

Digital/Agile Era (2000-Present): Modern Integration 

  • 2001: The Agile Manifesto is written, introducing iterative, non-critical-path methods for software development.
  • 2010s: Hybrid project management becomes popular, combining CPM (for predictable, sequential work) with Agile methods (for unpredictable work).
  • Today: CPM algorithms are embedded in modern scheduling software (Microsoft Project, Oracle Primavera, ClickUp), enabling real-time recalculation of the critical path. 

Key Components of CPM

  • Network Diagram: A visual representation of activities (nodes) connected by dependencies.
  • Forward Pass: Calculates the earliest start (ES) and finish (EF) times for tasks.
  • Backward Pass: Calculates the latest start (LS) and finish (LF) times for tasks.
  • Float Calculation: Determines how long a task can be delayed without affecting the project completion date (Float = LS – ES).
  • Critical Path: The path with zero float; any delay in these tasks delays the project. 

CPM Critical Path Method project management and detailed historical timeline by era and year

ISO 21500 high-level guidance on project, program, and portfolio management

ISO 21500 is a set of international standards providing high-level guidance on project, program, and portfolio management. Initially published in 2012 as a guidance document for project management, it was updated in 2021 to serve as the foundational, high-level “Context and Concepts” document for a broader suite of ISO project management standards (ISO 21500–21505). 

ISO 21500 Development Timeline

  • 2007: The ISO Technical Committee ISO/TC 258 (Project, programme and portfolio management) began working on a global project management standard.
  • September 2012: ISO 21500:2012 (Guidance on Project Management) was officially published, providing a generic framework for project management and a common language for professionals.
  • 2017: Work intensified on updating the standard to reflect new best practices and to transition into a family of standards (21500-21505).
  • 2020: ISO 21502:2020 was published, taking over the detailed guidance on project management formerly covered by ISO 21500:2012.
  • March 2021: ISO 21500:2021 (Project, programme and portfolio management – Context and concepts) was released, replacing the 2012 edition, with a focus on defining the overarching environment for project management rather than specific processes. 

Detailed Historical Timeline of Project Management

The following timeline details the evolution of project management leading up to the ISO standards. 

1. Ancient Era – Pre-1900: Foundation & Construction

  • Ancient Times: The pyramids of Giza, the Great Wall of China, and Roman infrastructure demonstrated early, sophisticated, large-scale project management.
  • 1896: Carol Adami developed the harmonogram, a precursor to visualization tools. 

2. Early Modern Era (1900–1950): Scheduling Techniques 

  • 1910-1915: Henry Gantt developed the Gantt Chart, revolutionizing scheduling by tracking project progress visually.
  • 1940s: Large-scale projects, such as the Manhattan Project, pioneered modern, integrated project teams. 

3. The Golden Age (1950–1980): Formalization

  • 1957: DuPont introduced the Critical Path Method (CPM) for chemical plant construction.
  • 1958: The U.S. Navy developed PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) for the Polaris missile project.
  • 1962: U.S. Department of Defense mandated Work Breakdown Structures (WBS).
  • 1965: Founding of the International Project Management Association (IPMA).
  • 1969: Founding of the Project Management Institute (PMI). 

4. The Silver Age (1980–2000): Methodologies & Technology

  • 1984: Eliyahu Goldratt published “The Goal,” introducing the Theory of Constraints (TOC).
  • 1986: Takeuchi and Nonaka defined Scrum as a flexible, holistic product development strategy.
  • 1987: PMI published the first Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) guide.
  • 1989: The UK government developed PRINCE (Projects in Controlled Environments), later evolving into PRINCE2.
  • 1995: Scrum was formalized for software development by Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber.
  • 1996: PMI published the first official edition of the PMBOK Guide. 

5. Modern Era (2000–Present): Agile & Global Standardization 

  • 2001: Publication of the Agile Manifesto, highlighting flexible and user-focused development.
  • 2007: ISO began developing international project management standards.
  • 2012: ISO 21500:2012 published, providing a global, standard-agnostic guide for project management.
  • 2017: The Association for Project Management (APM) received a Royal Charter.
  • 2020-2021: Shift towards Agile and hybrid methodologies; PMI released PMBOK 7th Edition, focusing on principles over processes.
  • 2021: ISO 21500:2021 (updated) and ISO 21502:2020 (detailed guidance) were established as the new global standard for project management.

ISO 21500 high-level guidance on project, program, and portfolio management

PERT Program Evaluation & Review Technique summary & detailed historical timeline by era & year

The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a project management tool developed in the late 1950s to analyze and represent the tasks involved in completing a complex project. It is designed to handle uncertainty in project scheduling by using three time estimates (optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely) to calculate the expected duration of tasks. 

Summary of PERT Project Management

  • Origin: Developed in 1958 by the U.S. Navy Special Projects Office to manage the Polaris missile submarine program, which involved thousands of contractors.
  • Purpose: To schedule, organize, and coordinate tasks within complex, non-repetitive projects, allowing for the identification of the critical path.
  • Key Feature (Three-Time Estimate): Unlike traditional methods, PERT uses a probabilistic approach.
  • Visual Structure: A PERT chart acts as a network diagram, using nodes (circles/rectangles) for events and arrows for tasks and dependencies.
  • Impact: Credited with shortening the Polaris project timeline by two years.

Detailed Historical Timeline of PERT (1950s–Present)

The Era of Development (1950s)

  • 1957: The groundwork for network scheduling began in the US, with DuPont developing the Critical Path Method (CPM) and preliminary research into PERT concepts beginning.
  • 1958: Birth of PERT. The U.S. Navy Special Projects Office officially develops PERT for the Polaris missile project to manage high uncertainty in R&D.
  • 1958: The first two publications, Program Evaluation Research Task, Summary Report, Phase 1 and 2, are written (primarily by Charles F. Clark) to document the technique.
  • 1959: Willard Fazar of the Navy officially introduces PERT to the public in The American Statistician, detailing the use of three time estimates. 

The Expansion and Mainframe Era (1960s–1970s) 

  • 1960s: PERT is widely adopted by NASA and the U.S. Department of Defense for large, schedule-driven projects.
  • 1962: The US Department of Defense mandates the use of Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) for projects, reinforcing PERT application.
  • 1965: PERT is applied to the planning and organization of the 1968 Winter Olympics in Grenoble.
  • 1970s: PERT/CPM software packages begin to be used on mainframe and minicomputers. 

The PC and Software Era (1980s–1990s)

  • 1980s: With the advent of personal computers, PERT software becomes accessible, leading to adoption in software development and manufacturing.
  • 1984: The Theory of Constraints (TOC) is introduced, which later influences critical chain methodologies, adding to network scheduling techniques.
  • 1987: The Project Management Institute (PMI) publishes the first white paper on the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), including network techniques.
  • 1997: Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) is introduced as a new approach to managing resources and task uncertainty, building on PERT/CPM principles. 

The Digital and Agile Era (2000s–Present)

  • 2000s: PERT charts become a standard feature in project management software (MS Project, Primavera), automating the calculation of critical paths.
  • 2012: ISO 21500:2012 provides guidance on project management, incorporating network analysis techniques.
  • 2017/2021: PMBOK releases 6th and 7th editions, integrating PERT and network scheduling with agile and adaptive environments.
  • Present: While overshadowed by Agile (Scrum/Kanban) in software, PERT remains crucial for complex construction, R&D, and defense projects, often used in hybrid approaches. 

Key Components of a PERT Chart

  1. Event (Node): A milestone representing the start or completion of a task.
  2. Activity (Arrow): The actual task required to move from one event to another.
  3. Critical Path: The longest sequence of dependent tasks, determining the minimum project duration.
  4. Float (Slack): The amount of time a task can be delayed without delaying the overall project. 

Adaptive Project Framework (APF) Adaptive Project Management (APM)

The Adaptive Project Framework (APF), often called Adaptive Project Management (APM), is a flexible, client-driven methodology designed to handle high-complexity, high-uncertainty projects where goals are clear but the methods to achieve them are not. Unlike traditional “Waterfall” approaches that follow rigid, linear plans, APF embraces change, utilizing iterative cycles to learn from previous results and improve future project practices. 

Summary of Adaptive Project Framework (APF)

  • Core Philosophy: “Think like a chef, not a cook.” APF adapts to the situation rather than strictly following a pre-written recipe.
  • Key Principles:
    • Client-driven: The client is a co-manager, determining next steps and adjusting scope.
    • Thrive on change: Change is expected and embraced, not resisted.
    • Iterative Cycles: Work is done in short cycles (“iterations”), with deliverable reviews at the end of each.
    • Learn by doing: The project strategy evolves based on learning from the outcomes of previous cycles.
    • Maximize Business Value: Focuses only on tasks that add value, reducing non-value-added work.
  • Core Characteristics:
    • Adaptive Scope: Scope is not fixed; it is continuously adjusted.
    • Just-in-Time Planning: Plans are made in detail only when needed, not months in advance.
    • Continuous Feedback: Regular checkpoint reviews with the customer.
  • The 5 Step APF Process:
    1. Project Scope: Defining the “Conditions of Satisfaction” (CoS).
    2. Cycle Schedule: Planning the iterative work.
    3. Cycle Build: Carrying out the work.
    4. Client Checkpoint: Reviewing deliverables and revising the plan.
    5. Final Report: Evaluating success and gathering lessons.

Historical Timeline of Adaptive Project Management

Adaptive project management evolved to address the limitations of traditional, rigid project management when faced with the rapid change and high uncertainty of the 21st-century IT landscape. 

Pre-Adaptive Era (Pre-1950s)

  • 1917: Henry Gantt develops the Gantt chart, pioneering rigid scheduling.
  • Pre-1950s: Project management is informal, experience-driven, and relies heavily on one-time planning. 

Early Evolution of Iterative Methods (1950s–1980s)

  • 1957: Critical Path Method (CPM) invented by Dupont.
  • 1958: Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) developed for complex US Navy projects.
  • 1975: First inklings of iterative techniques appear (e.g., iterative and evolutionary development).
  • 1986: Scrum is named and described as a new style of managing projects. 

Rise of Agile and Pre-APF Adaptive Models (1990s)

  • 1991: Rapid Application Development (RAD) is described, linking timeboxing with iterations.
  • 1994: The CHAOS Report is first published, highlighting the high failure rate of traditional projects, driving the need for better methods.
  • 1995: Scrum is introduced formally by Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber.
  • 1997: Extreme Programming (XP) and Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) emerge. 

Formalization of Agile and Adaptive Concepts (2000s) 

  • 2001: The Agile Manifesto is signed, formalizing iterative, client-focused development.
  • 2002–2004: A surge of adaptive techniques, including Radical Project Management, Extreme Project Management, and Agile Project Management. 

The Development of APF (2010s-Present)

  • 2010: Robert K. Wysocki publishes Adaptive Project Framework: Managing Complexity in the Face of Uncertainty, formally defining the APF methodology.
  • 2010s-2020s: Shift toward “adaptive project management” in HR and business transformation to thrive in high-uncertainty environments.
  • 2022-2025: Increased emphasis on automated data-driven decision-making within APF to maximize efficiency.

Six Sigma project management summary and detailed historical timeline by era and year

Six Sigma is a disciplined, data-driven methodology and project management strategy designed to improve process performance, eliminate defects, and minimize variation. Pioneered at Motorola in the 1980s, it aims for a near-perfection standard of no more than 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO). It is often used in combination with Lean principles (Lean Six Sigma) to simultaneously eliminate waste and reduce variation. 

Six Sigma Project Management Summary

Six Sigma project management relies on a structured, five-phase framework known as DMAIC (pronounced “duh-may-ick”) for improving existing processes: 

  • Define: Identify the project goals and customer deliverables (Critical to Quality – CTQ).
  • Measure: Quantify the current process performance and gather baseline data.
  • Analyze: Determine the root causes of defects and variation.
  • Improve: Implement and verify solutions that eliminate the root causes.
  • Control: Standardize the new process and implement monitoring to ensure long-term sustainability. 

Key Project Roles (The Belt System):

  • White/Yellow Belt: Basic awareness and team members.
  • Green Belt: Leads projects, assists Black Belts.
  • Black Belt: Leads complex projects, acts as change agent.
  • Master Black Belt: Coaches Black/Green Belts, oversees strategy.

Detailed Historical Timeline by Era and Year

Pre-1980s: Foundational Quality Efforts 

  • 1799: Eli Whitney introduces the concept of interchangeable parts (standardization) to produce muskets, reducing variation.
  • 1920s: Walter Shewhart at Bell Laboratories shows that 3-sigma process control is necessary to reduce variation.
  • 1950s: Toyota Production System (TPS) develops to create efficiency and quality. 

1980s: Origin and Development (The Motorola Era) 

  • 1981: Motorola leadership (Bob Galvin) initiates a push for increased quality, arguing that traditional 3-sigma defects (thousands) were insufficient, prompting a push for DPMO.
  • 1985: Engineer Bill Smith pens a paper proposing the term and methodology of Six Sigma.
  • 1986: Bill Smith officially introduces Six Sigma at Motorola, with Mikel Harry and Bob Galvin as co-contributors.
  • 1987: Motorola formally founds the Six Sigma improvement program, targeting a 10-fold reduction in defects.
  • 1988: Motorola receives the first Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award.
  • 1989: Motorola establishes the Six Sigma Research Institute. 

1990s: Expansion and Standardization (The GE/Allied Signal Era) 

  • 1990: Motorola introduces the concept of Black Belts to formally lead improvement projects.
  • 1993: Motorola registers Six Sigma as a trademark.
  • 1994: AlliedSignal adopts Six Sigma, with CEO Larry Bossidy leading the effort.
  • 1995: Jack Welch adopts Six Sigma at General Electric (GE), optimizing the DMAIC approach and boosting its popularity.
  • Late 1990s: Over 2/3 of Fortune 500 companies start Six Sigma initiatives. 

2000s: Integration with Lean (The Lean Six Sigma Era) 

  • 2000s: Global adoption of Six Sigma by companies like Sony, Jaguar, Samsung, and Adidas.
  • 2002: Michael George publishes “Lean Six Sigma,” combining the speed of Lean (waste reduction) with the quality of Six Sigma (variation reduction).
  • Mid-2000s: Six Sigma expands beyond manufacturing into services, healthcare, and finance. 

2010s – Present: Digitalization and Advanced Analytics

  • 2010s: Integration of data-driven Six Sigma with technology, including real-time monitoring and advanced data analytics.
  • Present: Incorporation of Big Data, Machine Learning, and AI to enhance analytical capabilities and predictive maintenance within the DMAIC framework. 

Key Contributors to Six Sigma

  • Bill Smith: “Father of Six Sigma,” developed the concept at Motorola.
  • Bob Galvin: CEO of Motorola, supported and pushed the adoption of the methodology.
  • Mikel Harry: Co-developed the methodology and helped establish the Six Sigma Institute.
  • Jack Welch: Former CEO of GE, championed the strategy, proving its power outside of manufacturing.
  • Larry Bossidy: CEO of Allied Signal, instrumental in early adoption.

Six Sigma project management summary and detailed historical timeline by era and year

Scrum Agile Framework summary and detailed historical timeline by era and year

Scrum is an Agile framework for managing complex, innovative product development through small, cross-functional teams working iteratively in short time-boxes called Sprints. Inspired by a 1986 “rugby” approach to product development, it was formalized in the early 1990s by Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber to improve team productivity and deliver value quickly.

Scrum is based on empiricism—transparency, inspection, and adaptation—and is defined by specific roles (Product Owner, Scrum Master, Developers), events (Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, Retrospective), and artifacts (Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment). 

Detailed Historical Timeline

The Conceptual Era (Pre-1990s)

  • 1986: Takeuchi and Nonaka publish “The New New Product Development Game” in Harvard Business Review. They introduce the “rugby” approach—a team working together, passing the ball back and forth, to increase speed and flexibility. 

Scrum Takes Shape (1990–1999) 

  • 1993: First Scrum implementation: Jeff Sutherland, John Scumniotales, and Jeff McKenna at Easel Corporation apply these concepts to software development.
  • 1995: Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland present a paper, “The SCRUM Development Process,” at the Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA) conference in Austin, Texas, formally introducing the framework.
  • 1996: Ken Schwaber and Mike Beedle refine the process, focusing on software development.
  • 1999: Mike Beedle, Martine Devos, Yonat Sharon, Ken Schwaber, and Jeff Sutherland publish “SCRUM: An extension pattern language for hyperproductive software development”. 

Agile and Formalization (2000–2009) 

  • 2001: Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and 15 others create the “Agile Manifesto” in Snowbird, Utah. Schwaber and Beedle publish the first book on Scrum: Agile Software Development with Scrum.
  • 2002: Ken Schwaber, Mike Cohn, and Esther Derby found the Scrum Alliance to provide certifications.
  • 2004: Ken Schwaber publishes Agile Project Management with Scrum.
  • 2006: Jeff Sutherland founds Scrum Inc..
  • 2009: Ken Schwaber leaves the Scrum Alliance and founds Scrum.org to provide Professional Scrum accreditation. 

The Scrum Guide Era (2010–Present) 

  • 2010: First “Scrum Guide” is published by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland to define the framework, often revised in subsequent years (2011, 2013, 2016, 2017).
  • 2017: PRINCE2 Agile is published, adding governance layers for organizations using Scrum.
  • 2020: The latest Scrum Guide (November 2020) is released, focusing on a more minimal, less prescriptive definition, introducing the “Product Goal” and changing “Development Team” to “Developers”. 

Key Components of Scrum

  • Roles: Scrum Master (servant leader), Product Owner (backlog owner), Developers (build the product).
  • Events: Sprint (1–4 weeks), Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, Sprint Retrospective.
  • Artifacts: Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment. 

Scrum Agile Framework summary and detailed historical timeline by era and year