Erin Brockovich – About

Erin Brockovich (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Erin Brockovich
Erin Brockovich (film poster).jpg

Theatrical release poster
Directed by Steven Soderbergh
Produced by
Written by Susannah Grant
Music by Thomas Newman
Cinematography Ed Lachman
Edited by Anne V. Coates
Distributed by Universal Pictures
(USA & Canada)
Sony Pictures Releasing
Release date
  • March 17, 2000
Running time
130 minutes
Country United States
Language English
Budget $52 million
Box office $256.3 million

Erin Brockovich is a 2000 American biographical film directed by Steven Soderbergh and written by Susannah Grant. The film is a dramatization of the true story of Erin Brockovich, portrayed by Julia Roberts, who fought against the energy corporation Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). The film was a box office success, and critical reaction was positive.

Roberts won the Academy AwardBAFTAGolden Globe AwardScreen Actors Guild Award, and various critics awards for Best Actress. The film itself was also nominated for Best Picture and Best Director for Steven Soderbergh at the 73rd Academy Awards. He did win that year, but rather for directing the film Traffic. Early in the film, the real Erin Brockovich has a cameo appearance as a waitress named Julia.


In 1993, Erin Brockovich is an unemployed single mother of three children who has recently been injured in a traffic accident with a doctor and is suing him. Her lawyer, Ed Masry, expects to win, but Erin’s confrontational courtroom behavior under cross-examination loses her the case, and Ed will not return her phone calls afterwards. One day, he arrives at work to find her in the office, apparently working. She says that he told her things would work out and they did not, and that she needed a job. She asks Ed for a job, which he reluctantly gives her.

Erin is given files for a real estate case where the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is offering to purchase the home of Donna Jensen, a resident of Hinkley, California. Erin is surprised to see medical records in the file and visits Donna, who explains that she had simply kept all her PG&E correspondence together. Donna appreciates PG&E’s help: she has had several tumors and her husband has Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but PG&E has always supplied a doctor at their own expense. Erin asks why they would do that, and Donna replies, “because of the chromium”. Erin begins digging into the case and finds evidence that the groundwater in Hinkley is seriously contaminated with carcinogenic hexavalent chromium, but PG&E had been telling Hinkley residents that they use a safer form of chromium. After several days away from the office investigating, she finds her possessions missing from her desk. She is then informed by Brenda, Mr. Masry’s secretary, that she has been fired for missing a week of work.

Later, Ed visits Erin because he needs the documents she found while investigating, and she takes the chance to request her job back in return. Rehired, she continues her research, and over time, visits many Hinkley residents and wins their trust. She finds many cases of tumors and other medical problems in Hinkley. Everyone has been treated by PG&E’s doctors and thinks the cluster of cases is just a coincidence, unrelated to the “safe” chromium. The Jensens’ claim for compensation grows into a major class action lawsuit. Unfortunately, all direct evidence is linked solely to PG&E Hinkley and not to PG&E corporate in San Francisco.

Knowing that PG&E could slow any settlement for years through delays and appeals, Ed decides to arrange for disposition by binding arbitration, but a large majority of the plaintiffs must agree to this. Erin returns to Hinkley and persuades all 634 plaintiffs to go along. While she is there, a man named Charles Embry approaches her to say that he and his cousin were PG&E employees, but his cousin recently died from the poison. The man says he was tasked with destroying documents at PG&E, but, “as it turns out, [he] wasn’t a very good employee”.

Embry gives Erin the documents, which include a 1966 memo proving corporate headquarters knew the water was contaminated with hexavalent chromium, did nothing about it, and advised the Hinkley operation to keep this secret. The judge orders PG&E to pay a settlement amount of $333 million to be distributed among the plaintiffs, five million of which goes to the Jensens.

In the aftermath, Ed hands Erin her bonus payment for the case but warns her he has changed the amount. She states that she deserves more respect, but is astonished to find that he has increased it—to $2 million.



The film was shot during eleven weeks with five weeks taking place in Ventura, California.

Erin Brockovich performed well with test audiences but executives at Universal Studios were worried that audiences would be turned off by the title character’s use of profane language.


Box office

Erin Brockovich was released on March 17, 2000, in 2,848 theaters and grossed $28.1 million on its opening weekend. It went on to make $126.6 million in North America and $130.7 million in the rest of the world for a worldwide total of $257.3 million.


The majority of critics responded favorably towards the film, with Roberts’s performance receiving positive reviews. It holds a certified “Fresh” rating of 84% on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes based on 145 reviews, with an average rating of 7.34/10. The consensus states, “Taking full advantage of Julia Roberts’s considerable talent and appeal, Erin Brockovich overcomes a few character and plot issues to deliver a smart, thoughtful, and funny legal drama.” On Metacritic, the film holds a score of 73 out of 100 based on 36 reviews, indicating “generally favorable reviews.”

In his review for The New York ObserverAndrew Sarris wrote, “We get the best of independent cinema and the best of mainstream cinema all in one package. Erin Brockovich, like Wonder Boys right before it, makes the year 2000 seem increasingly promising for movies”. Newsweek magazine’s David Ansen began his review with, “Julia Roberts is flat-out terrific in Erin Brockovich.” Furthermore, he wrote, “Roberts has wasted her effervescence on many paltry projects, but she hits the jackpot this time. Erin, single mother of three, a former Miss Wichita who improbably rallies a community to take on a multi-billion-dollar corporation, is the richest role of her career, simultaneously showing off her comic, dramatic and romantic chops”. Rolling Stone magazine’s Peter Travers wrote, “Roberts shows the emotional toll on Erin as she tries to stay responsible to her children and to a job that has provided her with a first taste of self-esteem”. In his review for Entertainment WeeklyOwen Gleiberman gave the film a “B+” rating and wrote, “It’s a delight to watch Roberts, with her flirtatious sparkle and undertow of melancholy, ricochet off Finney’s wonderfully jaded, dry-as-beef-jerky performance as the beleaguered career attorney who knows too much about the loopholes of his profession to have much faith left in it”. Sight & Sound magazine’s Andrew O’Hehir wrote, “Perhaps the best thing about this relaxed and supremely engaging film (for my money the best work either the director or his star has ever done) is that even its near-fairytale resolution doesn’t offer a magical transformation”. In her review for The Village VoiceAmy Taubin wrote, “What’s pretty original about the picture is that it focuses an investigative drama based on a true story around a comic performance”.

However, film critic Roger Ebert gave the film a two-star review, writing, “There is obviously a story here, but Erin Brockovich doesn’t make it compelling. The film lacks focus and energy, the character development is facile and thin”. In his review for The New York Times, A.O. Scott wrote, “After proving, for about 40 minutes, what a marvelous actress she can be, Ms. Roberts spends the next 90 content to be a movie star. As the movie drags on, her performance swells to bursting with moral vanity and phony populism”. Time magazine’s Richard Corliss found the film to be “slick, grating and false. We bet it makes a bundle”.

Home media

The film was released on VHS and DVD on August 15, 2000.

Awards and honors

Erin Brockovich received numerous awards. The Broadcast Film Critics AssociationLos Angeles Film Critics Association, and National Board of Review voted Julia Roberts Best Actress of the year. The National Society of Film Critics voted Steven Soderbergh Best Director for his work on both Traffic and Erin Brockovich.

Erin Brockovich received four Golden Globe Award nominations, including Best Motion Picture – DramaBest Director (Soderbergh), Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama (Roberts), and Best Supporting Actor – Motion Picture (Albert Finney). Julia Roberts went on to win the only award for the film for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama. The film received five Academy Award nominations, including Best PictureBest Director (Soderbergh), Best Actress (Roberts), Best Supporting Actor (Finney), and Best Original Screenplay (Susannah Grant). Roberts won Best Actress, the only Academy Award the film received. However, Soderbergh lost out to himself for his work on the film Traffic.

For her portrayal, Roberts became the first actress to win an Academy AwardBAFTACritics’ Choice Movie AwardGolden Globe AwardNational Board of Review, and Screen Actors Guild Award for a single performance.

American Film Institute recognition:


On her website, Brockovich says the film is “probably 98% accurate”. While the general facts of the story are accurate, there are some minor discrepancies between actual events and the movie, as well as a number of controversial and disputed issues more fundamental to the case. In the film, Erin Brockovich appears to deliberately use her cleavage to seduce the water board attendant to allow her to access the documents. Brockovich has acknowledged that her cleavage may have had an influence, but denies consciously trying to influence individuals in this way. In the film, Ed Masry represents Erin Brockovich in the car crash case. In reality, it was his law partner, Jim Vititoe. Brockovich had never been Miss Wichita; she had been Miss Pacific Coast. According to Brockovich, this detail was deliberately changed by Soderbergh as he thought it was “cute” to have her be beauty queen of the region from which she came. The “not so good employee” that met Brockovich in the bar was Chuck Ebersohl. He told Erin about the documents that he and Lillian Melendez had been tasked by PG&E to destroy.

The scientific accuracy of the film has been questioned. According to The New York Times, scientists have suggested that their profession would have more rationally and scientifically evaluated the medical evidence that inspired Brockovich. One scientist who spoke to the paper urged audiences to ask themselves if the science supports the film’s assertions.


  1. ^ “Hollywood Discovers Ventura County”Los Angeles Times. August 1999. Retrieved August 16, 2013.
  2. ^ Willens, Michele (June 25, 2000). “Putting Films to the Test, Every Time”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  3. ^ Erin BrockovichBox Office Mojo. Retrieved December 5,2008.
  4. ^ “Erin Brockovich (2000)”Rotten TomatoesFandango. Retrieved April 11, 2019.
  5. ^ “Erin Brockovich Reviews”Metacritic. Retrieved April 11,2019.
  6. ^ Sarris, Andrew (March 19, 2000). “She Doesn’t Have a Résumé, but She’s Got Other Assets”The New York Observer. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  7. ^ Ansen, David (March 13, 2000). “A Trash-Talking Crusader”Newsweek. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  8. ^ Travers, Peter (February 9, 2001). Erin BrockovichRolling Stone. Archived from the original on December 5, 2008. Retrieved December 5, 2008.
  9. ^ Gleiberman, Owen (March 24, 2000). Erin BrockovichEntertainment Weekly. Retrieved December 5, 2008.
  10. ^ O’Hehir, Andrew (May 2000). Erin BrockovichSight and Sound. Archived from the original on December 31, 2009. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  11. ^ Taubin, Amy (March 14, 2000). “Tit for Tat”The Village Voice. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  12. ^ Ebert, Roger (March 17, 2000). Erin BrockovichChicago Sun-Times. Retrieved May 7, 2008.
  13. ^ Scott, A.O (March 17, 2000). Erin Brockovich: High Ideals, Higher Heels”The New York Times. Retrieved December 5,2008.
  14. ^ Corliss, Richard (March 20, 2000). “Erin Go Bra”Time. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  15. ^ Lyman, Rick (December 20, 2000). “High-Decibel Oscar Buzz”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  16. ^ Cardwell, Diane (January 7, 2001). “Critics Group Honors Quirky List of Film Favorites”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  17. ^ Lyman, Rick (December 22, 2000). Gladiator and Traffic Lead Globe Nominees”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4,2010.
  18. ^ Lyman, Rick (January 22, 2001). “Surprises but No Dominator at the Golden Globes”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  19. ^ Lyman, Rick (February 14, 2001). GladiatorCrouching Tigerand Soderbergh Are Oscar Nominees”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  20. ^ Lyman, Rick (March 26, 2001). “Oscar Spreads the Wealth, butGladiator Takes Top Prize; Julia Roberts Is Named Best Actress, And Russell Crowe Is Chosen Best Actor”The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2010.
  21. ^ “Erin Brockovich – The Movie”Erin Brockovich.
  22. Jump up to:a b “Chasing the Frog – Erin Brockovich – Questioning the Story”Chasing the Frog. Retrieved December 5, 2008.
  23. ^ Masry & Vititoe – Erin Brockovitch resumé ArchivedFebruary 12, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  24. ^ Erin Brockovich ‘Take It From Me Life’s a Struggle But You Can Win’ McGraw-Hill copyright 2002
  25. ^ Kolata, Gina (April 11, 2000). “REFLECTIONS; A Hit Movie Is Rated ‘F’ In Science”. The New York Times. Retrieved January 23, 2013.

External links


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s